Companies/US/CRVS

CORVUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Last · —$9.38-0.03 (-0.32%)live · yahoo · 2h ago
Vol 627.9K ≈ 6.17M
Market cap$789.05M—
P/E · TTM—fwd — · eps —
Beta—vs S&P 500
Div yield—annual · TTM
52w range
——
Volume—session

Issuer

Legal nameCORVUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
HQUnited States (US)
ListingUS CRVS
ISINUS2210151005
SectorHealthcare
IndustryDrugs (Pharmaceutical)
SIC2834
CurrencyUSD
Entity registrysec:0001626971
CIK0001626971
LinkedIn
Employees37
AddressCorvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 901 Gateway Boulevard 94080, South San Francisco +650 900 4520
Loading chart…

OpenFilings analyst

Our analyst

Agentic read of the latest earnings call — recommendation updates when we process a new transcript. Research synthesis, not investment advice.

Latest call · Q2 2026

Neutral/high-risk speculative:

Corvus ended Q2 with $215.2 million in cash and marketable securities, extending its runway into Q2 2028, but the $18.0 million quarterly loss and $16.0 million R&D spend show a rapidly escalating cost base. The investment case rests on soquelitinib, with the Phase III PTCL futility analysis expected in Q1 2027 and Phase II atopic dermatitis data in Q3 2027; however, the most encouraging AD efficacy comes from only 24 patients in the highest-dose cohort, while management disclosed no interim PTCL efficacy data.

Themes
  • Soquelitinib
  • Ptcl Phase 3
  • Atopic Dermatitis
  • Angel Pharmaceuticals
  • Asthma
  • Hidradenitis Suppurativa
+2

Near term

Enrollment execution in the 150-patient Phase III PTCL trial is the key near-term operational milestone; the independent committee can stop the study for futility, and no interim safety or efficacy data will be released.

Angel Pharmaceuticals expects first-cohort atopic dermatitis data by year-end 2026 and second-cohort data in Q2 2027, providing potentially important external validation before Corvus's own Phase II readout.

The planned September 2026 hidradenitis suppurativa study and US asthma trial initiation will broaden the pipeline but add spending before proof of efficacy.

The Q2 cost structure is worsening: R&D rose to $16.0 million from $7.9 million year over year and net loss increased to $18.0 million from $8.0 million, despite the recently funded runway.

Longer term

The AD thesis depends on reproducing the Phase I signal in the approximately 200-patient SIERRA-1 trial and demonstrating that the observed post-treatment durability is real; management acknowledged that drug-free remission is not part of the initial regulatory strategy.

Soquelitinib's proposed advantage versus established IL-4/IL-13 therapies and JAK inhibitors is activity across Th2 and Th17 biology, but this remains a mechanistic hypothesis until controlled trials show differentiated efficacy and durability.

The asthma strategy could address both T2 and non-T2 disease, a potentially large market expansion, but the company has not yet shown clinical efficacy in either subtype.

Angel provides a 49% equity stake and access to Chinese trials, but Corvus's economic exposure and influence also increase dependence on an affiliate whose clinical and financing execution must be monitored.

Red flags

The strongest AD result—75% EASI-70 versus 20% placebo—came from a small Phase I cohort of 24 patients, creating substantial replication and statistical-risk in Phase II.

The PTCL program's pivotal risk is concentrated in the Q1 2027 futility analysis; the independent committee may terminate the trial, and management provided no efficacy data to assess whether the program is on track.

Management repeatedly cited durable, drug-free remission and broad immune rebalancing, but the regulatory pathway does not currently seek a remission claim and the evidence is observational rather than prospectively validated.

The HS study has up to 25 patients and no placebo arm, making it useful mainly for biomarker and proof-of-concept exploration rather than a competitive efficacy readout.

The asthma program's proposed ability to drop T2 or non-T2 cohorts is sensible risk control, but management did not disclose a firm sample size or quantitative futility thresholds; broad claims about non-T2 efficacy remain unproven.

The company is spending aggressively ahead of multiple readouts and has no commercial revenue identified in the call; another financing could become necessary if trials expand or timelines slip.

Against established AD and asthma therapies, a novel mechanism alone is not a moat. The company must demonstrate a meaningful efficacy, safety, dosing, or durability advantage, none of which is yet established in adequately powered trials.

OpenFilings analyst view from primary-source filings and earnings calls — not investment advice.

From latest 10-K · 2026-03-12

  • Operating Cf Burn
  • Cash Runway Low
  • Accumulated Deficit High

Red flags

  • Operating Cf Burn — Negative operating cash flow
  • Cash Runway Low — Cash runway ~0.1 years
  • Accumulated Deficit High — Accumulated deficit / equity 674%

Upcoming earnings

1 event
9:00 PM UTC+1
Period
Sep 2026
Est. EPS
−$0.21
Est. revenue
0

Earnings transcripts

1 recent

Press & signals

2 recent
  • GlobeNewswire

    Corvus Pharmaceuticals Provides Business Update and Reports Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results

  • GlobeNewswire

    Corvus Pharmaceuticals to Provide Business Update and Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results on August 6, 2026

Documents

FormReporting forFiledFlags
2026-06-302026-08-06 3
2026-06-112026-06-150
2026-06-112026-06-150